No. 

According to the timestamp on the GA thread, func is now 3 years old. According to my memory, there were about 10k posts in the first year, 20k posts in the second year, and 10k posts this year. I wonder what made 2004 so active.

As for the slowness, Sleepwalkr gave me some tips to improve database performance, but I probably won't be able to get to them until I deal with the issue of my hard drive being broken and possibly losing a bunch of data.

Merry Christmas. 

the issue of my hard drive being broken and possibly losing a bunch of data.

ack o_o

Merry Christmas.

Happy Yuletide. 

Nice one on keeping this going, this autumn/winter has been a bit dry, but it's still good, people still post interesting stuff, I visit daily at least, w3rd.

Happy Christmas to you too.

P.S. I agree entirely with post #9580 

Happy Yuletide. 

Thanks again for another year of keeping this level thang goin.'

As long as Quake single player maps trickle forth like urine from a senile old man, we'll be allllllright. :] 

I back for a few hours. It's nice to touch my keyboard again. A good news: I hope I'll buy a laptop soon to be able to map in any place of the world.

So merry christmas and happy new year to everyone here (i won't be able so say it in time) 

Like other said, I would like to thank metlslime to keep Func_ alive, and I also would like to thank all guys here for all advices, comments, even flaming sessions, they gave during this last year...

Merry Christmas to you and yours... 

to all aussies now, and everyone else when it comes around to their timezone. 

to everyone 

HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!

Thanks Func_people for all your advice, your speedmap critiques, and most of all for keeping Quake fun alive for another year!

Cheers! 

HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!

Thanks Func_people for all your advice, your speedmap critiques, and most of all for keeping Quake fun alive another year!

Cheers! 

my first double-post! 

the post title was very appropriate 

any speedmapping today? or was it yesterday? 

1400 DM maps which I got from Trinca somewhen:
http://www.quaddicted.com/dm/ 

I've finally found myself a good WinAmp replacement: http://www.musikcube.com

Found by a complete accident (was reading /.), this player has good library and playlist functions, has way lower CPU and memory footprint than WinAmp 5 and also has a built-in CD ripper. 

You know foobar, do you?
http://www.foobar2000.org/ 

When I was looking for a winamp replacement I had a brief look at foobar, but it is just so ugly. From what I remember it can't be made to sit neatly in the corner like winamp and has a rather ugly and clumsy looking interface. Of course, because of that, I couldn't be bothered with it in the end.

Then I realised that despite being owned by AOL (I think) Winamp is still free and good, so I have gone back to it.

I'll have a look at musikcube I suppose. 

it's nice because it does ogg, which very few players do.
itunes is nice even if you don't have ipod. doesn't seem to use up much resources and is fairly easy to organise a lot of music with it 

I think you need a freely available plugin, but it will do most formats if you can be arsed to find the plugin.

I can't be arsed with ogg anyway, it seems the same as mp3, and 99% of my music is mp3 anyway. 

WinAmp does OGG without any plugins and so does musikCube. 

how is iTunes nice? It's HUGE. It's got that shitty brushed silver cool thing going on that I hate. I hate these enormous thick menu bars and space wasters all over the place that seem common to all of the two Apple programs I have seen on PC (the other being the HORRENDOUS Quicktime.)

I don't care if iTunes has got really great functionality since I only want a program to play music files unobtrusively in the background (not guess what my favourite tunes are or allow me to buy files from the internet).

There's also the whole issue I have with Apple in general - mainly brought about by mac lovers who think that anything Apple makes is automatically cook and brilliant. Fair enough, their design is better than MS, but I'm sure they still have the same greedy corporate mind - despite what Apple fanboys seem to think. 

yeah, i imagine winamp has ogg now, but i got foobar for that a couple of years ago. i never ever really liked winamp either, so i never thought of switching later on.

as for itunes, like i said, it seems to be pretty good for resources, but yeah, the interface is large. i tend to keep it minimized in the tray icon and just bring it up to switch songs once in a while so that really doesn't bother me at all.

(not guess what my favourite tunes are or allow me to buy files from the internet)
frankly, i don't ever remember it doing that. i installed it, saw a popup talking about the feature, closed it and never saw anything like that again. the option *is* there to go buy music off the net, but it doesn't come up unless you ask it to (you can click on it), so again, not an issue for me.

really, it depends on how you listen to music. if you listen to your entire collection at random, or small lists, or one song at a time, etc etc
when i'm not particular about what i want to hear, i like to leave itunes on shuffle and have it play anything at random. when i get selective, i pull out mplayer32.exe and only switch songs when i'm bored of the current one. if i want to hear a small list, i'll usually throw it together in foobar, because i find it's faster to gather songs in different folders together with it (just drag and drop). 

another good winamp replacement

http://koti.welho.com/hylinen/apollo/