well googling "frik file" gives me almost no more information other than that page you linked, and that Darkplaces supports it, so I'm guessing it's probably something that was supported in that one engine? 

well, yeah, in theory, any engine that supports the FRIK_FILE extension, but afaik, it's just DP.

it is a powerful system though, you could, in theory, transfer player info with a text file between savegame loading as well as use it to transfer over monsters in the trigger zone so that it behaved like half life. (although you might run into trouble if you brought over monsters that were not precached in the map originally). 

You might have to work really hard to get monsters which weren't present before loaded in the level, but I think it might be possible. The thing you have going for you is that you can notice early enough that you need to run extra precaches, as the transfer data is available on the initial frame.

The thing you have to contend with is the modelindex field in the saved game you're loading (assuming the player has already visited the level) - if you precache extra models you'll probably invalidate the existing modelindex values, especially since you'd likely have to do all of this extra precaching during worldspawn. Given the choice we would prefer to do all the precaches after the other spawn-functions, where they couldn't wreck things.

So what we'd have to do is lots of clean-up when we get our onload function running. We could start with the idea that we need to do setmodel(self, self.model) on all the entities at this stage, and then try and work out all the exceptions we need to flag. Should be possible to get that working on anything that isn't a modelindex entity hack, and you know, you can't always save that kind of thing in a mod.

I did get excited for a little bit when I thought about how much storage you'd need for a monster, and figured I could get it down to 34 bits a monster. For a second I was excited as the parms provide enough space for 9 such monsters plus a player! Then I remembered we didn't have the parms and was saddened... 

Is it possible to remove (or at least, hide) the "Saving to..." line that appears as a console message on top left of the screen which displays the full path to .sav file, by modifying the progs file? Lately I noticed that longish message distracts me greatly. 

It's something that the engine does so in general you can't modify it away from the progs. If you had game saves which were being triggered from inside the progs (like an autosave feature or a hub system thing) you could mask it by appending ";echo \n\n\n\n" to the command string, but it's a bit hacky, you're wiping the whole notification area like that and making a bit of a mess of the console log.

If you wanted to adapt your favourite engine to not do it then it's a pretty easy change. Grab the source code for the engine, open host_cmd.c and comment out the following line:

Con_Printf ("Saving game to %s...\n", name);
 

Bind your save key to "con_notifylines 0; save quick.sav; con_notifylines 4" 

Like anyone can grab the source code for an engine, pop it into an IDE and hit compile and not get a gajillion errors.

fteqccgui.exe = easy QuakeC
<insert typical IDE here> = ERRORS!! The C++ Lord laughs at you and says "You're not supposed to be here!" 

That only works in JoeQuake-like engines.

I don't think Quakespasm supports it nor FitzQuake. DarkPlaces uses "con_notify". 

@qmaster
that's more of a dependancy thingm combined with thesystem header files cahanging significantly with every single new ide version (especially between vendors).
qc just has NO dependancies - just compiler and vm. many qc mods still break to engine incompatabilities or compiler bugs. :P

@spirit
con_notifytime 0
set it back to 3 after 3 seconds have elapsed, or increase it over time.
there's a more portable solution for you. :) 

The con_notifytime 0 does appear for a split second. Probably 1 frame.

(Which is why the non-standard con_notifylines 0 is nice) 

Somewhere on func_ recently there was discussion on 20fps animation in Quake, and one of the obstacles was that the QC might cope badly with them if the engine dropped below that framerate. Here in partial answer to that problem is a blog post:

https://tomeofpreach.wordpress.com/2015/03/28/thinking-fast/

It's also me trying to rewrite a much older post I made on func_ trying to describe exactly how the Quake engine deals with time and think functions. I hope the new approach taken makes it a bit easier to understand. 

aka sv_gameplayfix_multiplethinks (exists as a cvar in both fte+dp)
vanilla quakeworld already performs multiple thinks per second if the real framerate drops too low somehow.
it'll just keep running think functions until it catches up with the actual time.
(yes, this means that really low think intervals is just wasteful). 

how does it behave if you set nextthink = 1? 

gives up because it didn't progress at all.
there's a lot of mods that use self.nextthink = time;
the time global will presumably stick one frame behind.
its probably also worth mentioning that quakeworld really doesn't do the whole fixed interval thing at all, favouring latency over smoothness (vanilla doesn't support interpolation at all).
it doesn't exactly do the order thing either, if you abuse newmis 

gives up because it didn't progress at all.

does it think exactly once though? otherwise, it is another compatibility break with winquake. :(
i use nextthink = 1 when I need one single think update on the very next frame. 

@necros
vanilla quakeworld: that's an infinite loop
fte: exactly what you want: exactly one think per physics frame if you set nextthink <= time like that.

@Preach
'If the drop to 10fps was only temporary then the entity may �catch up� once the framerate increases, but this will result in strange extra-fast behaviour in the meantime'
This is incorrect. time will be clamped to the start of the frame, even in vanilla nq.
This means that while an entity may run slowly in nq, it will NOT catch up / run fast once framerates increase.
(the nextthink = 1 example should give the time value that was correct at the start of the frame in every engine, due to this clamping - it will still be meaningful for the thinks of other entities although it'll happen about half a frame sooner than it otherwise would). 

I've updated the article, although now I'm a bit worried that I have the way frametime increases the wrong way round. From double-checking the source (what I should have done rather than writing the article from memory!) it looks like thinks are actually triggered when they're less than the true time plus the next frame length. This means the startframe function has the true time, but it's actually earlier than all the times thinks will occur this frame. The engine still lies about what time it is - but lies that it's the future rather than the past.

When it's morning and I'm less prone to making a mistake I'll put a second amendment in the article and fix all the tables 

depends how you define it.
startframe gets the time at the start of the frame. once the frame is done, time is updated to starttime + frametime. ie: the physics frame covers a block of time rather than a single absolute timestamp. Its still lying about being in the past (time should be starttime+frametime), but logically it somewhat IS in the past, as its trying to update those entities that still have thinks pending since the last frame. 

Yeah, the problem is that the article is taking the position that any function not told that time = starttime + frametime is being lied to (and if you're lied to, you can't successfully simulate multiple thinks). Under that definition, the startframe function is also lied to, since it is told time = starttime. However, it can always reason about which think functions should run this frame from this position, so I think it would be better to redefine what's lying etc... 

'but lies that it's the future rather than the past'
startframe is told its in the past, not the future.
think times are unordered, but always within the time period defined by the frame.

if you want to update the entities to the _current_ time then you should be using while(ent.nextthink<=time+frametime)
just make sure you don't do this on movetype_push entities. 

I'm trying to obtain a kind of a flamethrower for a model.

I'm a bad coder, everything just happens on the experience of addding to an excisting code.

To get the explod2.spr working I made a flame script that looks like this:


$frame 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

void() flam_stand1 =[ 0, flam_stand2 ] {};
void() flam_stand2 =[ 1, flam_stand3 ] {};
void() flam_stand3 =[ 2, flam_stand4 ] {};
void() flam_stand4 =[ 3, flam_stand5 ] {};
void() flam_stand5 =[ 4, flam_stand6 ] {};
void() flam_stand6 =[ 5, flam_stand7 ] {};
void() flam_stand7 =[ 6, flam_stand8 ] {};
void() flam_stand8 =[ 7, flam_stand9 ] {};
void() flam_stand9 =[ 8, flam_stand10 ] {};
void() flam_stand10 =[ 9, flam_stand11 ] {};
void() flam_stand11 =[ 10, flam_stand12 ] {};
void() flam_stand12 =[ 11, flam_stand13 ] {};
void() flam_stand13 =[ 12, flam_stand1 ] {};



void() model_flam =
{
precache_model ("progs/explod2.spr");
precache_sound ("ambience/waterfal.wav");
ambientsound (self.origin, "ambience/waterfal.wav", 0.5, ATTN_NORM);

self.solid = SOLID_BBOX;
self.movetype = MOVETYPE_NONE;

setmodel (self, "progs/explod2.spr");

setsize (self, '16 16 16', '24 24 24');
self.think = flam_stand1;
self.nextthink = time + 0.1;
};


void() FlameExplode =
{
// T_RadiusDamage (self, self.owner, 120, world);

// WriteByte (MSG_BROADCAST, SVC_TEMPENTITY);
// WriteByte (MSG_BROADCAST, TE_EXPLOSION);
// WriteCoord (MSG_BROADCAST, self.origin_x);
// WriteCoord (MSG_BROADCAST, self.origin_y);
// WriteCoord (MSG_BROADCAST, self.origin_z);

// BecomeFExplosion ();

T_RadiusDamage (self, self.owner, 40, world);
sound (self, CHAN_VOICE, "weapons/r_exp3.wav", 1, ATTN_NORM);

WriteByte (MSG_BROADCAST, SVC_TEMPENTITY);
WriteByte (MSG_BROADCAST, TE_EXPLOSION);
WriteCoord (MSG_BROADCAST, self.origin_x);
WriteCoord (MSG_BROADCAST, self.origin_y);
WriteCoord (MSG_BROADCAST, self.origin_z);

self.velocity = '0 0 0';
self.touch = SUB_Null;
setmodel (self, "progs/explod2.spr");
self.solid = SOLID_NOT;
s_explode1 ();

};

void() FlameTouch =
{
if (other == self.owner)
return; // don't explode on owner
if (other.takedamage == DAMAGE_AIM)
{
FlameExplode();
return;
}

sound (self, CHAN_WEAPON, "weapons/bounce.wav", 1, ATTN_NORM); // bounce sound

if (self.velocity == '0 0 0')
self.avelocity = '0 0 0';
};

/*
================
W_FireFlame
================
*/
void() W_FireFlame =
{
local entity missile;

self.currentammo = self.ammo_rockets = self.ammo_rockets - 1;

sound (self, CHAN_WEAPON, "weapons/grenade.wav", 1, ATTN_NORM);

self.punchangle_x = -2;

missile = spawn ();
missile.owner = self;
missile.movetype = MOVETYPE_BOUNCE;
missile.solid = SOLID_BBOX;
missile.classname = "flame";

// set missile speed

makevectors (self.v_angle);

if (self.v_angle_x)
missile.velocity = v_forward*600 + v_up * 200 + crandom()*v_right*10 + crandom()*v_up*10;


else
{
missile.velocity = aim(self, 10000);
missile.velocity = missile.velocity * 600;
missile.velocity_z = 200;
}

missile.avelocity = '300 300 300';

missile.angles = vectoangles(missile.velocity);

missile.touch = FlameTouch;

// set missile duration
missile.nextthink = time + 2.5;
missile.think = FlameExplode;

setmodel (missile, "progs/explod2.spr");
setsize (missile, '0 0 0', '0 0 0');
setorigin (missile, self.origin);
};


I compared the sprite with the grenade code of the ogre.
If I can stop it tumbling and make a straight foreward replacement of the sprite
it could give an idea of a flame thrower.

The result of this is, that the sprite only gives one frame, and all projectiles head east.

What should I do to prevent this? 

You aren't running the model_flam function anywhere, which partly explains why you aren't getting an animation. 

the model_flam. 

I'm just shooting in the dark.

I tried another way in the entity.qc by making a missile_explode, _touch, _launch and make the entity shoot the sprite. I only see one sprite frame, while there are 12.

Trying to add the flameframes of the sprite I can't use the entity.qc because it has it own frames.
The weapon.qc has already the grenade sprite so there it won't fit either.

So the script was a site file to make the entity launch the sprite as an attack scene of a kind of flamethrower.
Where do I make this call to the flame.mdl.

Probably it needs another statement to get the result. 

What I did was the first part at the end of model_flam make a flame.qc
and try to use the rest as the attack scene for the entity.