@spike

forgot to mention that r_softwarebanding only works with paletted source textures

I do use indexed/paletted textures (not quake's palette). though this might not be what you mean?

@mankrip

This is one of the possibilities I've studied for a long time, and it isn't worth it. The problem isn't just the size of the palette, it's the speed performance.

I had a feeling...

So, I really have 2(ish) options: 8bit (with all it's limits) or some sort of post-processing shader.

I don't understand how it works, but a glsl shader seems like a brute force method that's not as accurate as a true 8bit renderer. I imagine it functioning like the way I do it in Photoshop: The scene is rendered, then "palettized", then sent to the display.

@mugwump

thanks for the link to the glsl shader... I've messed with that and a couple other shaders in DP and never got them to work. They either don't work at all or end up looking all messed up... :/ 

a glsl shader seems like a brute force method that's not as accurate as a true 8bit renderer. I imagine it functioning like the way I do it in Photoshop: The scene is rendered, then "palettized", then sent to the display.

AFAIK, that's exactly this.

The "correct" way would probably be to quantize textures to a global 8-bit color palette, generate 8-bit color transformation tables (lighting, blending, etc.) from the palette, and apply them using a fragment shader.

Faithfully replicating Quake's lighting is more complicated, because lightmaps should be upscaled 16x with bilinear filtering, and then quantized to 64 levels. Those 64 levels are then used to index the 64 levels of the color shading map (colormap.lmp). 

AFAIK, that's exactly this.

That isn't desirable IMO, though it may seem trivial to others.

Not only does it seem inefficient, the pre-palettized scene is just an approximation and sometimes won't look the way it's intended once palettized. 

Designing for software rendering is partially about defining the intended looks, and partially about accepting the resulting looks. 

http://forum.zdoom.org/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=53252 

Sorry, I meant to say "that", not "this". I'm not a native English speaker. 

Daemon engine supports Q3 maps and 3D color look up tables which could get you very close I think. In this case you could just take the look up table and apply the palette to it. Otherwise I guess you could do it a la deferred rendering and render lighting and albedo separate and then return the resulting index of lighting + albedo for every pixel, you'd only need 16 bits to store all that. Might be more true to quake's approach but I doubt the average player would notice the difference between the two, especially if you go low-res ("oh this looks like an *old* computer game").

It's probably easier to make a palette whilst doing art, only adding colors to the palette when you really need to, less is more and all. 

#622 - that seems to be the case.

#623 - I'm familiar with that. I think it's since been assimilated by the latest gzdoom build as "tonemapping".

#625 - I think I've come across that engine before, I think it was developed for a particular game? Something natural selection-esque IIRC. I'll have to give it another look. Thanks for the lead. 

Is there an existing GL engine that accurately fakes the software look? 

Qbism super8 I think.

quakespasm with all the graphics settings nerfed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtDBQ333KEo 

Quakespasm is not 8bit. 

I thought super8 was a software engine? Besides, I tried super8 and it fucked with so many basic things that I never wanted to open it again (weird particles, stupid weapon swaying etc, and it had some pointless palette-bend on by default which screwed up all the colours. 

quakespasm with all the graphics settings nerfed.

I'm talking about an emulation of how the software engine takes the texture pixel and the lightmap and then uses a LUT (quake's colormap) to output a colour still in the quake palette. There's something about the final look which is just magical to me, and it's not just nostalgia talking :} 

I am sure that Mark_V has a winquake style version now? Not tried it a great deal but might be worth checking out 

MarkV WinQuake looks great but is a software engine and thus I get single digit framerates on modern maps.

I was just hoping someone may have tried to emulate the software look using a modern graphics API, that's all. 

Well, I know you don't like DP but Nahuel recently uncovered a GLSL shader for DP that aims to emulate the retro look. I haven't tried it so I don't know how accurate it is, but you might want to give it a try. You can find it here: http://quakeone.com/forums/quake-mod-releases/finished-works/12469-hgszs-retro-quake-glsl-retro-shaders-darkplaces.html
Note that the 2016 DP builds break this shader, so Seven has fixed it (scroll down to post #10 for link). 

Read baker's last post in the mark v thread. I just shat myself with excitement. 

Read baker's last post in the mark v thread. I just shat myself with excitement.

Wait.

What.

Windows WinQuake through Open GL for KillPixel

You mean that? Because if that means what I think it means, then consider my dungarees dung'ed and my breeches browned also! 

damn just realised a few posts up people are talking about FTE doing this - I'll have to have a look. 

not sure if it was mentioned, but FTE has r_renderscale, too. 

I thought you were talking about the markv thread. I'm fucking brilliant. 

fte with r_softwarebanding 1 uses 8bit rendering for the world and models, except for coloured lighting (where each colour channel is performed as a separate lookup) so disable lit support if you want strict 8bit colours.
this applies to world(gl+vk renderers) and models(gl renderer). other things including particles etc are unaffected by this, but at least fte's particles can follow palette-based ramps too. 

Thanks - just had a look and r_softwarebanding looks lovely and I even like how it looks with fog and coloured lights on top of it too!

There's a lot of stuff I'll need to turn off though to make it look and sound more vanilla - is there a "proper oldskool" config somewhere? 

how do i turn off the mouse smoothing in FTE? 

m_filter defaults to 0 so reset that if its no longer 0. there isn't any other mouse smoothing.
m_accel 0 maybe? again defaults to off.

'fps_preset vanilla' should disable(and in some cases enable) all the stuff to make fte feel like vanilla's software rendering, including the demo reel, nq sbar, nq player physics, software banding, square particles, disables lerping, etc.
complete list of cvars changed with the presets: https://sourceforge.net/p/fteqw/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/engine/client/m_options.c#l818 (each preset is cumulative with the prior ones, so you'll need to consider the settings above the vanilla preset also, if you want the complete list)
the problem with lots of settings is figuring out which ones you actually want set. :s