News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
Film Thread.
I thought a trio of themed threads about other entertainment media might be good. If you're not interested, please just ignore the thread and pick some threads that interest you from here: http://celephais.net/board/view_all_threads.php

Anyway, discuss films...
First | Previous | Next | Last
 
No, it was won in the factories of Detroit. 
 
No, it was won in the factories of Detroit. 
BSG 
Really seems to divide people.

I am on the side of : It's the best damn sci-fi show ever created :P

I can't even be objective about it. That show had a direct line to every pleasure center in my brain and knew exactly when to pull the strings. I agree that S4 got a little wavey but the first three seasons are absolutely frakking fantastic tv.

Special mention for their depiction of space combat. Huge bulks of slow metal firing missiles, flak and bullets at each other while fighters duke it out in the middle. It felt like a submarine fight in space. Newtonian physics as well. And while some of the CG haven't aged as well as you might hope, it's still an absolutely beauty to watch in motion. I love what they did with the camera shots in space.

Ok I started gushing. Time to go! 
Exactly What DaZ Says. 
 
In Fact 
Last Act Of Fury 
Ruined an otherwise great film. 
 
yeah the cgi I really liked, the way everything appears floating, and that camera gimmick they do where it rapidly zooms in on something, it's quite cool. 
 
I liked BSG but not without willfully ignoring things (like JIMI HENDRIX OUT OF NOWHERE WHY ARE YOU IN SPACE JIMI)

Speaking of inappropriate music in BSG, there was a single episode where classic Cylons show up and speak in the classic Cylon voice and it's so outrageously "Intergalactic Planetary" I had to pause the episode to stop laughing (and go youtube the song). 
Saul Episode 6. 
Good god, Jonathan Banks has been completely underused. 
Yes 
Just finished watching and thought the same thing. What a performance! 
Lol Agree Re Hendrix 
that was the lamest part of s4. But I can forgive that when it's still strong overall. 
It's Simple 
Jimi Hendrix (or Bob Dylan? Both?) is the final Cylon!
I didn't mind it so much, and I thought McCreary's orchestral version was pretty cool.

Yeah, that last Saul episode was great. 
 
Watch Blade Runner. Then watch BSG. Then realize "Adama" was in Blade Runner and BSG is Blade Runner except instead of replicants they are Cylons even down to the use of the word "skin jobs" in Blade Runner as a slur to the replicants and the "is he/she human or not" air of mystery. BSG was great for the first 2 seasons regardless, then loses all focus.

"And they have a plan" --- Seasons 3 and 4 destroyed that and that was the mystery that made the first 2 seasons great, the feeling that some unknown and unseen subplot was going on.

-------------
Kona mentioned Star Trek above. I'm curious as what Star Trek he meant. The Next Generation is about unwatchable, loaded with cliches and smarmy humanocentric feelgoodisms. Maybe 15 episodes are pretty solid.

The entire first season could be used to torture prisoners of war in ...

A Clockwork Orange style
 
Re BSG music... oh that classical intro music is so out of place and wrong. I like classical music, but not here.

Haha maybe your just not a Star Trek fan Baker. But if you think The Next Generation is cliche, don't watch The Original Series. I did last year and by todays standards it's really quite bad. Just about every episode has the same few main characters getting trapped on a planet of humans that somehow took on a distinct era of human history and never evolved from there. I forced myself through the series once, that was enough for a lifetime.

But I'd put them in this order:
TNG > Voyager > DS9 > ............ TOS

Voyager was overall probably better, it's just Captain Janeway that annoyed the shit out of me. Equally as annoying as DS9's idiot Sisko. Picard on Voyager would have been great.

Never bothered with Enterprise.

DS9 suffered from the same thing as BSG - too much political drama.

Star Trek's casting has always been a bit sketchy, usually a few good characters mixed with poor ones that bring the whole thing down. 
Uhm 
DS9 suffered from the same thing as BSG - too much political drama.

I would say that the politics are what made BSG and DS9 more interesting than the other shows you mention. I liked TNG too, when I was a teenager, but when I watch it now I get so irritated by the bullshit deus ex machina storylines. This is what BSG did much better. The Star Trek shows you mention just repeat the same 5 cliches that Berman and Braga invented in the 80ies. So did Enterprise, but that got better when they fired the writers. But even after that, it still had a horrible cast except for captain Archer, which I thought was a great casting choice. 
Depends What You Want From You Sci Fi 
allegories of normal life are just exploration of unseen worlds etc.

Blade Runner, I actually rewatched the final cut on blu rya a couple of weeks ago, loved it but I hope that the upcoming sequel which has Harrison Ford signed on better not make it 'clear' that he wasnt a replicant. 
That Should Be Or Instead Of Are 
 
 
Star Trek started out as an altered form of the Twilight Zone, essentially, with Rod Serling replaced with a spaceship. The Enterprise was a vehicle for the writers to explore the history and present condition of humanity. That's what science fiction is used for when it's used to say something: examining a possible future to turn a lens on the present.

With TOS they hadn't learned how to be subtle with that in a way that made it feel natural. TNG was better at it but took a half a dozen seasons to figure out how. DS9 and Voyager then started to wander away from that by getting too absorbed in their own canon: the thousand-starship battles at the end of DS9 probably made all the fans totally squee, but didn't really serve any higher purpose than making all the fans totally squee.

Based on what I know about Trek, it honestly doesn't seem like that universe ever really got a direct, accurate, meaningful slam-dunk expression of what it was always trying to be about. Unfortunately, they've handed the reigns to JJ "Lensflare" "Don't think about the plot" "Damen Lindelhof is a good writer" Abrahms, who's been quoted saying he thinks Star Trek was too philosophical.

It seems like no matter what nerdy thing you're a fan of (trek, star wars, aliens, doom, buffy, indiana jones, etc) it seems like your ultimate fate is always eventually going to be to put your face in your hands and groan.

Fox didn't kill Firefly - they saved us from ever having to watch it die. 
The Thing With Firefly Though 
Is that it's not science fiction in the usual sense at all. Also it had Whedon as it's show runner, and he's good at maintaining a tight and clear vision over a long run. 
@kona 
Haha maybe your just not a Star Trek fan Baker

The TNG is safe, cozy, optimistic futuristic sci-fi in a social and political environment where the characters are never in error and humans reign supreme and everything is spoon-fed. It is good science fiction.

The original series is dangerous, unknown science fiction where the characters have to make rule of thumb decisions and live on the brink and constantly face unknowns well beyond their control. The crew never completely understand much and the unknowns generally do not get fully resolved.

One isn't better than the other (apples vs. oranges), but the original series presents complex choices and leaves some unknowns for the imagination. 
 
"Fox didn't kill Firefly - they saved us from ever having to watch it die."

Haha true, but that's kind of the same with all tv series. Rarely do they end on a high note with high ratings.

Firefly had plenty of issues though. I personally didn't care much for the whole "wild west sci-fi" theme. First time I saw the intro I thought wtf is this dr quin medicine women shit? But I got okay with it in the end. What I liked about Firefly was good characters (except the lead was a bit of a douche) and exploration. They weren't pinned into the same place all the time. Which is what Defiance consistently suffers from, they're just in the same cheap looking cargo container film set all the time. Does anyone watch Defiance?

Anyway back to Abrams, yeah he makes films for the masses, they make money so the studios are happy with him. But he can obviously do some good if he wants to; he created Alias and Fringe, both of which were fantastic in my opinion. Lost was okay too. 
Fringe 
whilst enjoyable was far from fantastic IMHO.

Re Abrams, he was obviously picked to mainstream Trek and he did that reasonably well with the first movie (second one above average). 
Err Firefly 
gets extra points for having Christina Hendricks in it. O_O 
 
Oh god yes... 
 
fringe was laughable

I literally watched that show only because it made me laugh every episode 
First | Previous | Next | Last
You must be logged in to post in this thread.
Website copyright © 2002-2024 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.