News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register | Log in
Q1 SP: Hrim_sp4 - For Love Of Evil!
So it's 2010 and I think it's about time for some releases! 8-)

Hrim_sp4 is made up of 4 maps.
One startmap, two turtlemaps and one bigger runic map!

The two small turtlemaps are:

Voidscape (From 2004)
Brownie (From around 2006)

The main map in this pack is:

For Love of Evil. (Build 2007-2009)

This map was first a speedmap that made it into a turtlemap and later became a fullgrown Quakemap.

The pack contains no new Qc or new monsters!
It's just me trying to get back to the roots, so no new fancy stuff here, only the good old progs.dat.

I hope you will have some fun with hrim_sp4.

OH! And a HAPPY NEW YEAR to you all!

Enjoy!

Download and screenshots:

http://hrimfaxi.dk/sider/hrsp4.htm
First | Previous | Next | Last
Lardarse 
Has been on a crusade for quite a while combating 'abusively difficult' gameplay in Q1SP.

I tend to ask a question to myself now - how few monsters can I make this fun with? 
 
I agree with everything said here.I think of like Koohoo or Nastrond though - even on hard those maps are pretty easy. and that's okay, because that is their style and sometimes I like to play those more spacious, atmospheric maps.

But other days I want to play StarkMon or whatever, a map where normal is hard, hard is nightmarish, and nightmare is insane.

I feel like it's like music - some people want to listen to like, Hammers of Misfortune, and others want to listen to like, Fukpig or something.

they can choose which concert to go to for themselves.

that's a shitty analogy. 
Tronyn 
THANK YOU!

Finally someone here realises that maps are becoming too hard... 
 
i think it's great to have someone like sock who isn't a stranger to the community yet hasn't been playing q1sp.
it gives a fresh view on everything. 
Sock 
Are you considering making anything in Quake?

And yeah, it's nice to hear a fresh viewpoint from a similar standpoint.

It's too easy to make stuff completely inaccessible, partly because of the size of the community, but mainly because the only way to get stuff really done is shut down on distractions and bury yourself in it.

So the original idea gets lost - the player and mapper are both supposed to have fun. 
Good Debate Guys. 
That.s all 
Stevenaaus 
I just finished reading that bioshock guy's essay talking up Doom2, and it's all pretty spot-on.

What essay is that? Sounds interesting. 
 
Thanks Spirit 
 
Ijed 
I have been meaning to play Q1SP maps for sometime but never got around to getting Q1 again. What with the recent steam midweek madness I thought I would take a trip down memory lane and play some old classic Q1.

The thing I find the most shocking is how everyone has forgotten what skill levels actually mean. There are 4 skill levels available and they should be a well thought out progression with noticeable differences like AI, health and pickups in different places.

I am really tempted to make a Q1SP but I am short on time at the moment and just happy to play Q1 and give my rather cranky feedback instead! :P 
Hah 
Well, seems to have caused some re-evaluations on difficulties.

Did you ever play the classic mods? Zerstorer, Insomnia, OUM, Nehahra etc.

Although Nehahra is a big spike in difficulty - the Ai is very fast and pretty close to being clever. 
Doom2 /bioshock 
The actual essay is here
http://vectorpoem.com/news/?p=74 
Hard Should Be Abusively Difficult 
any debate about it becoming 'too hard' is pretty much invalid because well, there's a clue in the name. so i'm assuming it's skill 1 people are complaining about, in which case, fair cop 
Well! 
Lots of good comments from everybody!
And lots of good points from Sock.
I'm sure everybody can learn from it.

Maybe I/we have become so used to hard combat that we forget to make a bigger difference between normal and hard skill levels.

Anyway it has been interesting to read Socks comments on the different maps he has played recently! 
No, That's Nightmare 
Or "beyond nightmare", if you have a mod that has this.

Believe it or not, it's possible to be hard without being abusive. If you ever need convincing of this, just play through e2m5rmx on skill 2... 
 
You do know that rj made e2m5rmx himself, right? 
 
I think Lardarse knows a couple of things. Apart from that, I think abusive can't be reinterpreted to mean "good". Abusive is bad.

I didn't find For Love of Evil abusive though, by and large. 
Hrm 
i was drunk when i posted that, clearly.

i think what i was trying to get across was that if people want to make their maps excessively difficult so only the true elite can beat them, then all the power to them. providing they keep this to skill 2 & use skills 1/0 to cater for the more casual player then this shouldn't be a point of criticism

(this is coming from someone who generally plays on skill 1) 
And 
i did enjoy this map. i died loads, but never in an annoying way. if that makes sense 
OTP 
Yes, and I also know that I was one of the testers for e2m5rmx...

One of the things that I liked about the map, when I was testing it, was that I was able to complete it the first time I played it, on both Normal and Hard. 
Void Speedrun 
 
You can't say that nightmare should be really evil but hard shouldn't be, because you can't customise nightmare.

You might end up with a large gap between skill 1 and skill 2 but there isn't really a way round that. 
 
Also Hrimfaxi where's that fuck off huge base level I seem to recall you posting shots of? :p 
Omfg 
I don't remember this at all. Must play. 
ZealousQuakeFan 
That map is still in the works.
But I haven't had much time to map the past few months.
But it will be finished at some point! 
First | Previous | Next | Last
Post A Reply:
Name:
Title:
Body:
message
question
exclamation
idea
flame
noflame
error
skull
beer
moon
pent
rocket
sheep
pacman
pig
cheese
worldcraft
gauntlet
crate
pitfall
pimp
smile
cool
sad
frown
oi
yay
tongue
evil
wink
neutral
q1
q2
q3
ut
hl
cs
doom
dkt
serious
cube
Website copyright © 2002-2017 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors.