Would it be possible to have an vertice integer snap mode or would that produce problems?? 

brushes which consist of all triangles. 

Re: https://twitter.com/kristianduske/status/508004011023540225 "TrenchBroom 2 now has a layer system. Layers can be hidden and locked individually."

Please add some more options:

"Exclude from compile"

"Hide all layers but this one"

Being able to group layers into (multi-level) groups would be great.

Also being able to assign colors to layers/groups.

Can you duplicate layers?

Can you drag'n'drop prefabs from the TB Store into the list????

Maybe check out how QuArK does things, random link to its documentation where you can see some of the GUI and features: http://quark.sourceforge.net/infobase/maped.tutorial.advanced.html#grouptechniques 

Feature requests go to the issue tracker, please.

Btw, if Quark does something in one way, then it's very likely I'll choose the opposite direction. Quark is a UI nightmare. 

 

Make it possible to request features in this thread. 

I don't have time to move stuff from here to the issue tracker. I really just don't. 

moved the first two. the third was already talked about. fourth is not that useful. fifth would just by copy/paste and make new layer. 

Agree on your verdicts. If anyone disagrees, they can open an issue on github. 

Thanks necros!

Sleepwalkr: That's like saying iOS is a UI nightmare just because the back button is at the most far away place in the top left. Quark does lots of things very well and editors could oh well your decision. 

Which BSP compiler is recommended for Trenchbroom maps? I'm beta testing 2.0 and I sometimes get into situations where my alignment in the editor doesn't match the alignment in the game. Passing in "-oldaxis" just moves the problems to other faces so I'm wondering if there's a specific BSP compiler that is known to work well with TB.

Also, a link directly to it would be appreciated. :) 

Sorry for the tone earlier. I know you like Quark, but I don't like its interface at all. I surely has a lot of useful features, but every time I try to use it, nothing works intuitively they way I expect it. That's why I consider it a nightmare. 

that may be a bug actually. i'm taking a bit of a break from testing right now, but i did notice that in some cases, faces at 45 degrees wouldn't match up in game. in fact, adjacent coplanar faces wouldn't match up with alignment either AND once you reload the map, the faces would go back to the old broken alignment. I can't figure out what particular circumstances causes that though. 

btw: i am using rebb's txqbsp (based on aguirre's txqbsp) without the old/alt axis switch. 

I'm using Tyrann's:

http://www.disenchant.net/

With -oldaxis but haven't run into the problems you describe, since I turned it on. 

I'm in the middle of a big refactoring right now and can't work on the bugs. 

pretty much what I use exclusively. 

So help me out please? How do I configure a custom entity so that I can rotate the entity in the editor? I've been bashing on the FGD and whatever else and I can't figure out what allows some entities to rotate (like players and monsters).

I have this:

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/161473/MDLBugs/2014-10-04%2015_41_57-wip.map_.jpg

And the FGD looks like this:

@PointClass base(Appearflags) size(-2 -14 -40, 22 14 16) color(255 255 255) model(":progs/decoring.mdl") = deco_ring : "Iron Deco Ring"
[
]

I can't rotate the entity in Trenchbroom. It ignores me. And I don't understand why. :-/

Is it obvious? 

As defined in the fgd. 

Ahh ... Ok, will try that! 

Ha, nice ... that fixed it AND it seemed to resolve the weird lighting problems I was getting in-game. Yay! 

 

That gave me quite a few headaches. 

I remembered it being submitted as a feature request but what's the status on adding a 2dview and grid? 

Progress is currently slow due to real life obligations. That is all ;-)