#1 posted by
mankrip on 2017/05/21 01:56:51
It's controversial to call it a "source port" when it was based on the binary rather than the source.
#2 posted by
metlslime on 2017/05/21 02:20:07
agreed i was a little confused by the terminology. His english isn't very good so it's hard to figure it out from the website. It seems like "decompiling" is more accurate than "reverse engineering" which is also used.
FEKKING AWESOME!!
#3 posted by Killes on 2017/05/21 11:17:42
So far it works pretty good, finally something better than dosbox to run blood!!!
This Is Pretty Awesome
I even got some mods working which is amazing!
I have a few suggestions -
- Mouse input should be smoother IMO
- Aspect ratio is wrong in widescreen resolutions
- needs voxel support!!
I'm sure there's much more but this is an amazing start!
I'll Abstain Until It's Complete
#6 posted by
killpixel on 2017/05/21 19:53:45
I can't wait, though.
#7 posted by Killes on 2017/05/23 04:46:48
Author has put out updates with fix at a proper clip.
This is too good to be true, hope he sticks with it, but its already great, and all this without source code, hats off!
#8 posted by
mankrip on 2017/05/23 06:23:04
I do not like the practice of linking to third-party articles instead of linking to the project's official home.
The official site for BloodGDX is this one, which is not linked in the topic description:
http://m210.duke4.net/index.php/42
It has much more accurate info than the posts out there.