you're welcom. 

Move over BFG, here comes the RR! 

Hahahahahahaha-hahahaha-ha-ha!!!
Heeehehehehe-wha-hahahahaha etc (ROFL) !!! 

Please kill yourself. 

lmao

but... what's the deal with the rick roll stuff? i never got that 

I really wasn't expecting to get rick roll'd then. 

Please go and listen to the Pet Shop Boys. 

Reviews:
Forwards Compatible
Zerstorer turtle map Pack

http://underworld.planetquake.gamespy.com/index.html 

14 points used to be a "good attempt" rating a few years back. Now, in the past-marcher past-warpspasm age, it's a "good map" rating.

It's a bit unfair towards newer maps. I thought Kell's map could also have scored higher.

/IMHO 

underworldfan nice work 

Its not much, but here are some scans from a US gaming magazine of the up ans coming Gearbox title:

http://games.tiscali.cz/news/news.asp?id=26192&r=top

I know they arent the best quality of pictures, but they're real atleast!!!

:P 

..anyone have it & care to share? it appears i forgot to save the setup file last time before formatting :-/

it used to be downloadable from filefront but seems to have disappeared. 

are those pictures just concept art? I like the way it's going. 

I love Tiddles! 

http://grandtextauto.org/2008/02/24/pvp-portal-versus-passage/

The article is overly simplistic in it's reasoning but if you also read the comments I think it provides some good food for thought. 

http://www.quaketerminus.com/tools.htm 

*site bookmarked* 

interesting topic, but the guy's argument is pretty worthless. He grades Passage based on the experience of playing it, but grades Portal based on cherry-picked anecdotes about the development process. If creator intent makes art, why does he say nothing about the intent behind Passage? If player experience defines art, why nothing about the experience of playing Portal? 

site doesn't work. (dns failure) 

but it's the discussion in the comments that's most interesting (which might not have been the case with a less provocative article...)

The "game medium" can be so very many different things and still almost all just stomp around the safe already treaded ground which is why passage is important and there needs to be more discussions like these. 

Thanks for the review. I'm glad you like it. 

okay, a couple of the comments were definitely worth reading. 

http://www.cgl.uwaterloo.ca/~csk/projects/mazes/

Even though I have little interest in actually wasting my time solving these, they look cool and there's some theory behind it. 

but yeah, I never saw the fun in trying to do mazes, it's just like being lost, so frustrating. 

Weird how so far very little has happened in '08 with Q1SP.

Is this because everyone is frantically working on stuff and so far nothing has been finished/showcased?

I personally started a new map at around the second week of January. Posted a few screenies a while back now. So im about 5.5 weeks into the build, and I can tell you that the world stuff of my map is about 69% done. I can be so specific because I've used about 22000 of 32000 possible marksurfaces. I'm hoping this will be the first limit I hit, cause my intention is to maximize on detail level in the map, but still have a map which will run in FitzQuake. My concept is quite doomish: more high-end enemies and high-end weapons in a dark underground sort of base-style environment, lots of tunnels/pipes and stuff. Give me a couple more weeks and I'll be needing some testers.

Anyone else wanna give an update?