 Nitin
#12207 posted by inertia on 2007/06/07 03:42:05
you also could do a journey mirroring that of "the motorcycle diaries"
 Inertia
#12208 posted by nitin on 2007/06/07 11:31:30
yep, lima's on the cards, for a little while at least.
dont have enough time to do the jungle (6 weeks) unfortuantely, plus the weather like you said will probably not be accomodating.
dont about a log, but there will be plenty of phtoos I'm sure :)
 Halo
#12209 posted by jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny on 2007/06/09 14:29:07
Hi i love halo i whant the new halo 2 for pc
 Halo
#12210 posted by jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny on 2007/06/09 14:29:23
Hi i love halo i whant the new halo 2 for pc
 Halo
#12211 posted by jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny on 2007/06/09 14:29:27
Hi i love halo i whant the new halo 2 for pc
 Halo
#12212 posted by jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny on 2007/06/09 14:29:28
Hi i love halo i whant the new halo 2 for pc
 Halo
#12213 posted by jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny on 2007/06/09 14:29:30
Hi i love halo i whant the new halo 2 for pc
 Halo
#12214 posted by jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny on 2007/06/09 14:29:30
Hi i love halo i whant the new halo 2 for pc
 Halo
#12215 posted by jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny on 2007/06/09 14:29:30
Hi i love halo i whant the new halo 2 for pc
#12216 posted by ijed on 2007/06/09 14:59:32
Well, jjjjjjjjjjjjjohnnnnnnnnnnny, why don't you go and say how much you whant the new Halo 2 on Pc, on a Halo forum; you </amusing insult #564>.
 From What I've Been Reading About It
#12217 posted by czg on 2007/06/09 15:22:48
no, you don't want the new halo 2 for pc
#12218 posted by madfox on 2007/06/09 21:32:47
I'm only seeing one halo...
 Halo Sucks
#12219 posted by - on 2007/06/10 00:40:58
#12220 posted by Trinca on 2007/06/10 01:46:51
wtf is Halo? :p
 Updated My Site
#12221 posted by Tronyn on 2007/06/10 02:09:28
with help wanted type stuff
details:
http://www.planetquake.com/tronyn
cheers
Tronyn
 Post #12222
#12222 posted by PuLSaR on 2007/06/10 22:54:14
Tronyn, you're still active. check your email
#12223 posted by Spirit on 2007/06/11 21:07:23
Thanks to neg!ke I added a huge load of map descriptions to Quaddicted.com the last days:
http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=12
http://www.quaddicted.com/?p=13
Also I changed the listings to show all the maps.
 Spirit:
#12224 posted by metlslime on 2007/06/11 21:42:33
I'm glad to see this is progressing.
One criticism: I think it would be better if the map descriptions were just objective *descriptions* of what the map contains, and not opinions or reviews about the quality of the map.
Things like size of map, setting, texture theme, types of new monsters, engine compatability, coop support, etc. would be more useful than "This is a small, stupid map."
 New Id Tech
#12225 posted by than on 2007/06/12 01:45:12
http://kotaku.com/gaming/update/id-shows-off-new-engine-on-mac-267790.php
More on shacknews and the id website (and probably all over the net). Haven't found any videos though :(
 Hmm...
#12226 posted by metlslime on 2007/06/12 03:33:57
isn't this basically a new brand name for the "megatexture"-based engine carmack has been making for quake wars?
 Video
#12227 posted by Spirit on 2007/06/12 09:53:03
http://www.youtube.com/v/HvuTtrkVtns
metl:
I agree, more information = better. I always try to include some bits of that information in the descriptions I do. It makes the whole process take longer though. Everyone can do the description as he/she likes. I don't like lenghty reviews (like Underworldfan's, Shambler's etc.) though, those won't be at Quaddicted.com.
The main goal at the moment (as I see it), is to get a first overview on all the maps. Like sorting out the crap, getting a timeline. The descriptions are not meant to be fixed. They are always open and ready to be changed. I am sure I will redo a lot of them in the end to make them more advertising for maps I like. But that's got lower priority than getting the first overview.
A small, stupid map won't get any longer description from me though. If someone else feels like doing it, then fine. :)
 TheWall - HLDM Oldschool Mappack
#12228 posted by negke on 2007/06/12 12:33:24
 Spirit:
#12229 posted by metlslime on 2007/06/12 18:47:17
In cases where you don't want to put a lot of info for some maps, that is cool, but please remove the useless opinion at least :)
 Hmm
#12230 posted by starbuck on 2007/06/12 21:41:16
that id tech doesn't look that jaw-dropping... how is it different to ET:QW? That has megatexture does it not?
It's only low quality shots and video we've got but unreal 3 engine looks a lot better. I always trust in Carmack though, hopefully id will pull through soon and show us something amazing.
 From What I've Read And Seen:
#12231 posted by - on 2007/06/12 22:33:06
Megatexture, as ETQW uses, only applies to the terrain. 1 huge texture on that.
What this new tech is doing is doing is making each object, including the terrain, static meshes, and presumably the characters, a unique texture.
|