 Desktop Linux ?
is a joke sometimes. Trying out Fedora 10 last night... it installed ok but I couldn't log in. Not from the GUI login screen or the console. Not as root or user.
F-ing unbelievable.
So i rebooted into runlevel 1 via grub, disabled SE Linux, rebooted again and could now log in as user. As you do.
Everything i tried was broke anyway. Kde-4.1 is still a pre-alpha disgrace (stick with 3.5), Kolf (mini golf) is now broke, no mp3 or video playback despite having multiple players installed, Gnome icon theme wouldn't resize, chess program glChess (gnome-games-2.24) is crap, and it screwed my system clock too.
Ricky, I had a look in my bios for a PnPlay item. The Bios is a bit shit actually.. there is a PCIPnP menu, but the only options are for PCI Latency timer and PCI IDE Busmaster, not the usual "PnP operating system"... So no win98 :(
 Want It That The AGP Didnt Work?
#3 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/04/26 06:30:44
I mean if you have an agp gfx card then look for AGP settings in bios, not PCIe
im no expert
 Want = Wasnt
#4 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/04/26 06:30:55
 Windows 7
#5 posted by Zwiffle on 2009/04/26 06:48:02
 Oh Noes...
#6 posted by metlslime on 2009/04/26 06:56:36
now i have to worry about people breaking into my house to install malware?
 Currently
#7 posted by starbuck on 2009/04/27 14:57:07
Dual-booting a really cut-down optimised version of XP, and Ubuntu 8. Works for me, think it's pretty unlikely I'll switch to Windows 9.
Anyone tried Ubuntu 9 yet?
 Yes
#8 posted by rudl on 2009/04/27 19:38:37
no problems so far.
boots really fast. Very cool indicator applet. New nvidia driver with opengl 3.0 8)
What I don't like is that they removed some partitioning features from the installer. Had to create the partition with gparted. Still using ext3 though.
 And Its
#9 posted by rudl on 2009/04/27 19:44:40
8.04
8.10
9.04 -> April 2009
not 8. 9.
 Ah Yes
#10 posted by starbuck on 2009/04/27 21:33:13
the bi-annual naming convention. Was running 8.10 before, and obviously its April now. Might be worth the reinstall from what I've seen. Tempted to try kubuntu 9.04, never ran KDE before but it always looks sexy as hell.
 BeOS MOTHER FUCKERS
#11 posted by - on 2009/04/27 21:46:53
Boosh.
 No Fucking Way
That Amiga OS that Aardappel was working on and then wasn't, and we never heard about again. THAT'S THE SHIT.
#13 posted by mwh on 2009/04/28 05:52:18
9.04 is fine for me. Suffering a bit from the "intel graphics are slow" problem.
Also FF3 seems to have a fetish for eating all the RAM in the machine, but that was going on with Intrepid too.
 9.04
#14 posted by megaman on 2009/04/28 12:01:58
the new kernel doesn't work on my Dell Latitude c400. Nor does a custom compiled one.
i run it fine with the 7.04 kernel though. the 8.10 one doesn't resume from standby...
Not that i noticed any difference besides new less annoying pop up bubbles... just that there's now more of them .
 Stop Complaining About Vista
#15 posted by Jago on 2009/04/28 13:25:28
Repeating what you hear on fuckwit anti-MS websites and posting experiences of running Vista on "brand" PCs loaded up the wazoo with useless bloatware won't make it true.
Vista is fine, on machines with 1GB ram, its as fast as XP, on machines with more, its faster.
 I Have Vista On This PC Here At Work
#16 posted by RickyT33 on 2009/04/28 13:52:47
I like it. Its great! Runs like a dream, boots fast, everything works, even got an old demo of Carmageddon 2 to work on it fine, Quake, everything. USB peripherals load faster (noticably).
Asus N10j NETBOOK running Vista Business - on an Atom processor:
Runs fine, no complaints there. OCed the Atom from 1.6Ghz to 2.01Ghz and despite what it says on the GamesRadar website Fallout3 runs fine.
4Gb and 2Gb RAM respectively.
 Yeah
#17 posted by ijed on 2009/04/28 16:38:40
Seems like most of the complaints about it hinge on the fact that people are scared of change.
I've got a new setup arriving with Vista.
I'm one of the windows lazy.
|