He's obviously looking for DM maps. 

Thx! 

Did anyone finish a start map over the weekend? 

... no. 

start map = boring, nothing to kill no fun... next theme please 

There are lots of LDs who like visuals and only do the monsters because they have to. Just FYI. :) 

...and only got one room :-( 

enough time in a speedmap session and the good ones could be used to introduce new maps by other people. 

 

http://www.quaddicted.com/stuff/apsp2+dpwater+qforcer.png
http://www.quaddicted.com/stuff/apsp2+qforcer.png
http://www.quaddicted.com/nostalgia/quakeisforeveryone_germanquakead.png (couldnt find my fixed version) 

I know Willem, good luck for you guys!

have fun 

There are lots of LDs who like visuals and only do the monsters because they have to.

Maybe those should team up with guys that find visuals too much work to really be able to do it properly. Like me.

It would probably require working from low detail gameplay testing layouts like in that other thread, though. 

http://www.last.fm/music/Sofus+Forsberg/_/Yeah+Fucking 

There are lots of LDs who like visuals and only do the monsters because they have to.

Nowadays those are called "environment artists" :) 

Haha, true enough. I do a lot of both so I forget that some guys are exclusively one or the other these days. 

Go map! 

not the proper theme for mapping... maby later on 

http://www.kongregate.com/games/TerryCavanagh/vvvvvv-demo 

Not bad, but the controls feel a bit loose.

Try this:

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/511754 

very cool game. Too bad the full game is $15... seems a little pricey based on the apparent size of it (8 levels, 2 of which were in the demo and fairly short.) 

Regarding wireless internet connections.

My phone exchange finally got upgraded last week so I got a new package deal that includes the new speed I can get, it also includes a free wireless router.

Now, I know next to nothing about wireless connections, but the most pressing worry I have is that I have no idea how far the signal will travel.

You see, the router will be connected to the phone line on the bottom floor of the house, but my pc is on the 3rd floor and I really, really don't want to move it. Any ideas here?

The 2nd thing is that I need to buy myself a wireless card for my pc, and I have no idea what make and model is good. I've heard horror stories about bad wireless cards dropping the connection all the time, and I really want to avoid that =)

Someone said this might be worth picking up http://www.ebuyer.com/product/50127/show_product_overview

I don't want anything fancy, but I want a stable connection above all else :) 

Just buy the 5-10 quids worth of cable - I'm guessing the router will have an old fasioned line output as well.

Wireless tends to be unreliable for packet loss unless you've got a slick netcard - like the one posted. But I suspect stuff like that won't be trustworthy because they're based on certain conditons, like not having walls or floor in-between.

Wireless is for laptops . . . 

If you have a phone socket on the 3rd floor, cant that go into your router direct, near your pc? or does it have to go into the main line on the bottom floor? 

dunno if this will help, but i get full signal strength through 1 floor. 

I have a cabled setup right now with a router on the 2nd floor, which is plugged into the only phone line socket in the house (w00t for old english houses) on the 1st floor with a huge extension lead =)

Then I run ethernet up to the 3rd floor for my pc. Really I could just keep this current setup and it would work ok, but I would like to remove all these cables trailing all over the house =)

If anyone has had any experience (good or bad) with using wireless internet through multiple floors I would be very grateful if you could post your thoughts!