 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
that look very very good :
http://www.quake3world.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=51&start=385&sid=56984c57049b767521d194fe1f37b086 Scroll down to see the shots posted by scrotch. I just realized its over two years since my last login...time flies for a newborn father I guess.. forgot my pass and changed my e-mail as well :l
Found a Q3 map I just about finished before my daughter came and realized it's not all that bad... a little dusty but still...or? http://web.comhem.se/~u70315877/shot1.htm Snaga: it looks like you've got some good shapes, spaces, and lighting going on, but the detail level in several spots looks more on par with Q1 than Q3. Also, the textures seem a bit plain, and although that's not bad in itself (e.g. geocomp maps) it just exacerbates the situation with the details. About half of the indoor stuff looks tasty, though. Such as shots 5 and 8.
On the other hand, pro gamers will probably prefer the sparseness of details. Nice clean style and great lighting, good build quality too, but a few stronger designs would be good. Not that it's not good at the moment, that is.
I'm going to go with the general consensus and say it looks really good but needs a little more love.
Personally, I quite like the textures. Slightly more detail on some of the panels might work, but it's funny that you jokingly talk of the design seeming dusty, because there is indeed an interesting dusty abandoned base look to them, and I think it might be cool to play to that more by having cobwebs here and there (look to RtCW's cobwebs for a good way of doing these), and giving some lights a subtle volumetric effect with scrolling dust motes. Slightly less saturated colours on your contrast lighting might work well if you play up the dust aspect. Also, get some phong shading on those rocks, it'll make them look much nicer. Thanks for input yall:)
I do agree with you in the lack of detail in most pics. My intention from the start was to make the map fast in game, beeing sparse with detailing. But I guess that, as R.P.G pointed out, can only be pulled off by fooling the eye with more detailed textures, or making stunning architecture. I don't think I have it in me to finish the map but it's always nice to get feedback on something you done. thanks shambler
I understand what you mean and i will work again on this map after my exam... for another texture I will use the "jackboot pack" the bricks are green but i can filter it in red. I m agree with u I must use irregulary brick textures. I will work. ke, here's some partly artia shots, but it's kinda small sized artia. :p
Not all that satisfied with it, but i guess it's ok. http://www.infosprite.com/members/Fjoggs/shizzle-3.jpg http://www.infosprite.com/members/Fjoggs/shizzle-4.jpg And for no reason: http://www.infosprite.com/members/Fjoggs/shizzle-5.jpg Industrial style, made of UT series but I'm sure can be used in any game :
http://www.planetunreal.com/phalanx/ Here are some screenshots from my last project... It has been started since Winter contest pack.. remember...
I already sent other screenies 2 month ago, and now I'm working to improve the gameplay... I hope it will be released before the end of June... ;) http://lambert.jeanphilippe.free.fr/Divers/CDA5.JPG http://lambert.jeanphilippe.free.fr/Divers/CDA6.JPG http://lambert.jeanphilippe.free.fr/Divers/CDA7.JPG http://lambert.jeanphilippe.free.fr/Divers/CDA8.JPG http://lambert.jeanphilippe.free.fr/Divers/CDA9.JPG Enjoy ! JPL, the butresses look great. Only crits I see are:
1.) Some areas look fullbright. May not be a problem, I tend to make darker maps so fullbright gets on my nerves. 2.) You might want to scale up the lava texture 2x2 or 3x3. It tends to help prevent the feel that the lava is fake.
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2025 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |