 News | Forum | People | FAQ | Links | Search | Register |
Log in |
|
|
non-interactive cutscenes are (in my opinion) a pretty dated and lazy way of progressing a games story and (more often than not) filling in for a lack of actual playable content.
"Next-gen" games, in my opinion - and you can write this off as idealistic bollocks if you want - should be moving in the exact opposite direction - away from cutscenes and towards (the ultimate goal of) incredibly rich and immersive real-time worlds that the player can interact with in as many ways as possible. In short, let the player create the story - not some hack wannabe filmmaker. hey I have a great idea how to make a movei into
a game in no time: Just take a movie, I mean the video itself, right. Add Quick-Time-Events(*) to each scene that has any hint of action. Yes! You have to timely perform that arbiturary button sequence to watch the next chapter of the movie. And again. Instant seamless blend of a movie(real actual movie!) and a game. Can I patent this? I call this "Next-Gen Cinematic Gaming" � *Quick-Time-Events: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/?p=544#more-544 game in the early 90's just like that. You had to time your button control movement to the movie cut scene footage or else your character was good as dead. Forget the name of the title though.
non-interactive cutscenes are (in my opinion) a pretty dated and lazy way of progressing a games story and (more often than not) filling in for a lack of actual playable content.
Exactly, I think this is why more and more people are getting pissed off with cut-scenes in games, because we've all seen that it can be done better without cut-scenes. You can look as far back as Half-Life 1 to see that, yet some developers just don't seem to get it. Another game I played recently that has some fairly long cut scenes is Mass Effect, except here they play part of the scene and then give the player a choice about what action to take next. I won't put any spoilers here but there are some major decisions being made in these cut scenes and the fact that you get to make them yourself adds a lot of weight to them. in Resident Evil 4 - a knife fight where the characters were growling plot at each other, every now and then you had to swing the wiimote or else get a cutscene of your guy getting his throat cut.
It didn't matter that it was a Res storyline (ie. crap) or that it could be repetitive retrying it since it was only a few different movements you had to do. The good thing was it seemed like a really difficult and dangerous bit of the game because of the storyline fight going on, when really you could probably do it with not even looking at the screen, sound only. Badly implemented good ideas are bad.
Bad ideas are bad. And I've seen quicktime events that I liked, but most (GOW) are a pain in the balls. I thought about that, my "Next-Gen Cinematic Gaming" � will only have 1 button controll and a motion sensor. It will be gun-shaped ofcourse!
And dont compare with those old games. You dont understand. "Next-Gen Cinematic Gaming" � will use full real movies. Seamlessly Blending The Movie And Game man, thats the future! kojima would agree If Deus Ex did it, than there is a successful way to make an element work.
But if you do have them, obey the rules of action flick cinema, get in fast, say what you have to say inside of half the time necessary to say it and not a second more and get out fast. Old school Mega Man goodness!!!!!!!!!!
Have you ever been excited about a game that goes back to 15 year old technology? I have now. What kind of an gay wet dream overlord of model is Snake?
http://www.gfdata.de/archiv07-2007-gamefront/metal-gear-solid-4-guns-of-the-patriots--20070724063651667.jpg That gigantic ass crack... And the ass humping when slowly crawling. Yuck!
|
|
| You must be logged in to post in this thread. |
|
| Website copyright © 2002-2026 John Fitzgibbons. All posts are copyright their respective authors. |