Func_Msgboard: Screenshots & Betas

Posted by metlslime on 2002/12/23 18:27:46

This is the place to post screenshots of your upcoming masterpiece and get criticism, or just have people implore you to finish it. You should also use this thread to post beta versions of your maps.

Need a place to host your screenshots? Upload them here:
http://www.quaketastic.com/
Username: quaketastic
Password: ZigguratVertigoBlewTronynsSocksOff
File size limit is 128MB.

First | Previous | Next | Last

Just For Fun

#7280 posted by Mike Woodham on 2011/01/23 20:01:25

No, not a quad shotgun, just a four 'shot' panorama

http://img843.imageshack.us/img843/3982/panorama1i.jpg

#7281 posted by Tronyn on 2011/01/23 20:08:55

Wow

#7282 posted by negke on 2011/01/23 20:17:52

Mike gives me wood-ham. Tronyn, too. Cool that you finally seem to have made proper use of the sorrow scrap. Now I can delete it from my editor folder.

Omg

#7283 posted by jt_ on 2011/01/23 20:32:26

So many good maps coming out soon, and so little time to play them. :(

#7284 posted by Trinca on 2011/01/23 21:49:31

there is always time to play a Quake map :9

nice shots tronyn can't wait to play then

Awesome

#7285 posted by RaverX on 2011/01/23 23:21:05

http://www.quaketastic.com/upload/files/1ind4.jpg

That looks awesome, simple, yet very cool, it really makes you think that you are there. Can't wait to play that map...

#7286 posted by necros on 2011/01/24 00:27:13

mike: looks like a cooler moria. :D i love that the upper area is shrouded in darkness. makes everything look even bigger.

tronyn: the scale is insane, especially on those industrial shots. ;) i was staring at the first industrial shot trying to place it, and then i noticed these tiny little ogres in the corner.
looks like you will be giving arwop a run for it's money. :P

also, i can recognize some stuff in those somethingwicked shots. ^_^ glad you could make use of it!

Mike.

#7287 posted by Shambler on 2011/01/24 11:06:08

I need to change my trousers.

But Oh Dear.

#7288 posted by Shambler on 2011/01/24 11:08:26

Trouser fail, I now need a 3rd pair after seeing Tronyn's shots.

Great stuff there.

Tronyn

#7289 posted by nitin on 2011/01/24 13:20:46

nice styles.

Mike, that looks great.

A Desert Dusk 3

#7290 posted by onetruepurple on 2011/01/24 13:44:30

The style in that Dry Sorrow(?) map is ace.

Nice Shots!

#7291 posted by generic on 2011/01/24 14:07:32

Mike & Tronyn! It's nice to see those scraps lit and so well put together. Can't wait!

"Quakery!" New Q1 Conversion ..

#7292 posted by m. augeri on 2011/01/24 14:29:53

..in development(hopefully)

http://www.quaketastic.com/upload/files/screen_shots/QuakerY_1.png

Mike:

#7293 posted by bear on 2011/01/24 14:32:46

Have you tried PanQuake?

Would be nice if someone made a nice modern shader based version of fisheyequake and panquake...

Playing With Coloured Lighting

#7294 posted by ZealousQuakeFan on 2011/01/25 19:47:50

A slight use:
http://www.zealousquakefan.com/images/arrival/zqftest03_construction49.jpg

Same area, more dramatic version, unsure about the colour combinations and positions though :(

http://www.zealousquakefan.com/images/arrival/zqftest03_construction51.jpg

Different bits
http://www.zealousquakefan.com/images/arrival/zqftest03_construction52.jpg

http://www.zealousquakefan.com/images/arrival/zqftest03_construction50.jpg

Thoughts?

#7295 posted by onetruepurple on 2011/01/25 19:50:47

Shots 49, 52 = tastefully done.

Shot 51 = foul.

Shot 50 = unsure, but it might work well in game.

#7296 posted by Spirit on 2011/01/25 19:51:29

slight use: very nice! might be even more subtle I think.
dramatic: looks like Shambler's rearside

Make sure not to create annoying grunt sniping gameplay, See http://www.quaddicted.com/reviews/sickbase.html as a anti-example (sorry Ricky :) ).

Question On Strong Colour

#7297 posted by ZealousQuakeFan on 2011/01/25 20:09:38

With strong lights, is it generally the saturation, the position (which wasn't thought out, I'm experimenting so was just matching them to the texture of the light source :p ) or the clash of colours (eg would switching spot lights to white improve it etc)

or is just the whole theme of the lighting shit?

ta for feedback :)

#7298 posted by rj on 2011/01/25 21:18:35

51 just looks like 49 with the white light removed :P

too dark and saturated. the other three are all nice though.. the colour complements the normal light rather than smothering it

Correct Comments.

#7299 posted by Shambler on 2011/01/25 21:47:22

Subtle good, over-colourful vile.

#7300 posted by necros on 2011/01/25 21:49:44

google up a colourwheel for painting houses and use that to figure out what colours to use.

full red/full blue lighting next to each other = ugly as fuck.

First Shot

#7301 posted by jt_ on 2011/01/25 21:50:33

Looks amazing.

Had Another Go:

#7302 posted by ZealousQuakeFan on 2011/01/25 22:10:17

Okay, a go at making that big room darker but less urgh...
Dropped saturation, increased ambient again, but moved the lights lower:

http://www.zealousquakefan.com/images/arrival/zqftest03_construction53.jpg

Too dark? Blue too strong? :E

Another corridor with some little highlights from the monitors
http://www.zealousquakefan.com/images/arrival/zqftest03_construction54.jpg

#7303 posted by necros on 2011/01/25 22:14:58

it's really not necessary to colour-code every single light and monitor. for main lighting, i'd stay closer to white, as well. for example, in 53, i'd make the red lights be pure red and very small radius. highlights, mainly. the blue strip lights i'd make as the main light emitters but make them nearly white, a very pale cyan.
there are more colours than just rgb.

Purple ?

#7304 posted by JPL on 2011/01/25 23:16:47

... bah, nevermind... :P

First | Previous | Next | Last

You must be logged in to post in this thread.