#10534 posted by [Kona] on 2014/02/02 21:43:27
haha tronyn, 15 years since shambler refused to review my first episode as well! he was offended I even thought he'd consider putting it on his site.
re start map, fifth that just looks like id's start map. what's the difference? if you're going to do big changes to the other maps, why not the start map as well? it could have a lot more detail added.
 Haha
#10535 posted by necros on 2014/02/02 21:58:43
shambler refused to review my first map too!
it sucked though.
 Start Map Is Fine Guizzzzzz
You'd be surprised at how different they actually are side-by-side. Mine is meatier with more detail and more defined lighting.
I might do a second pass on it once it's finished to make it feel a bit more unique anyway. I don't want to overdo the detail though as id maps were simplistic (and my intent is to actually release more maps per year).
#10537 posted by Breezeep_ on 2014/02/02 22:45:26
#10538 posted by Trinca on 2014/02/03 00:25:30
Look like HL1 :)
 Shambler.
#10539 posted by Shambler on 2014/02/03 12:01:20
WTF was he playing at??
On the plus side there does seem to be a correlation between having early maps rejected and then becoming a prolific and consistently good mapper :P
 Heh
#10540 posted by Tronyn on 2014/02/03 16:10:55
well also Shambler, as you pointed out, at some point the general quality of maps became so good that even someone's first map was worth reviewing
 That Initial Sting Makes You Work Harder
#10541 posted by Lunaran on 2014/02/04 03:53:40
"I'll show that fat bastard Shambler what a good Q1SP is."
 Yup
#10542 posted by RickyT33 on 2014/02/04 04:19:45
 Still Mapping...
#10543 posted by mechtech on 2014/02/04 07:27:32
#10544 posted by Trinca on 2014/02/04 08:03:11
Mechtech one word... impressive!
 Mechtech
#10545 posted by SleepwalkR on 2014/02/04 09:44:30
Nice architecture and texturing, but the lighting looks flat - maybe take some cues from sock's maps to improve it?
#10546 posted by [Kona] on 2014/02/04 11:41:53
yeah my episode sucked too. i thought it was pretty good at the time though haha.
 I'm Sooooo Glad You Said That Kona....
#10547 posted by distrans on 2014/02/04 12:00:18
I replayed the Alkado Crisis just before this "issue" raised its head and... not that it stopped me from being in awe back in the day :)
 Mech
#10548 posted by ijed on 2014/02/04 14:09:11
Are you using minlight?
Those walls are crying out for some spotlights!
 I Think The Redbrick
texture is very out of place. Looks nice except for that one thing really.
 Oh Putain Que C'est Beau !!!
#10550 posted by JPL on 2014/02/04 21:50:41
@Mechtech: wow.... really nice and awesome arch texturing... hats-off..
#10551 posted by [Kona] on 2014/02/04 22:37:13
haha distans I didn't even know that episode was still online anywhere, I thought I'd eradicated it from all existence!
we all start out somewhere making crap before we get decent. i guess to get pretty good it could take a good 50-100 hours, depending on the individual and how patient they are to improve.
i wonder what some of the early id levels were like, because I bet there was some early stuff in the learning phase that didn't make the cut. what did they do in the first 100 hours of level development...
 Very Much WIP
#10552 posted by mechtech on 2014/02/04 23:26:06
Some the the textures are from The Florentine Library by Sock. Still doing broad strokes. I want to get to the end, whatever that's going to be and fill in the monsters, lighting and skill specific stuff. I also want to find a good subtle fog setting. Any suggestions? using Fitz
 Hazy
#10553 posted by madfox on 2014/02/05 04:43:09
fog 0.02
#10554 posted by Trinca on 2014/02/05 17:33:37
I had more then 100 and never got decent :p
 Also
#10555 posted by Spiney on 2014/02/05 19:23:23
The models are nice, but they do look a bit flimsy when compared to the big rustic architecture of Quake. Got to thicken up the details a bit to prevent it from looking 'unnaturally realistic'. I think you could do some interesting things with the ceilings not typically seen in Q1
 #10555
#10556 posted by Kinn on 2014/02/05 19:48:55
Gotta agree with the comments about thin details looking wrong in quake.
Quake's combination of low-res textures and lightmaps, and lack of smooth light shading across polygon facets, all combine to make fiddly details look weird and wrong imo. Quake is best when painted in broad brushstrokes I reckon, although strangely the super-thin fence/bar stuff in czg's honey worked really well, so add the usual arse-talking disclaimer to my generalisation there.
 Thinness...
#10557 posted by necros on 2014/02/05 21:00:22
maybe this is just me but there are times where thin, tiny details can look good.
 I Try Not To Have Anything Less Than 16 Units
but it does happen.
Usually these are minor details anyway.
|